Quantcast
Channel: Microsoft Dynamics GP Forum - Recent Threads
Viewing all 45450 articles
Browse latest View live

RE: State W2 wages for all employees are zero

$
0
0

Leslie,

Thank you very much for pointing me to the UPR30301 table.  STXBLWGS_1 through STXBLWGS_12 are in fact showing zeros for all employee PAYROLCD'S.  Now I just have to figure out why the table is not being updated after each pay run for the state wages.  What is puzzling to me is that within the Employee maintenance - State Tax card, each employee has an active IL state tax code, all pay codes have check marks indicating wages are subject to state tax and Illinois state withholdings are being computed and deducted correctly with each payroll.  Is there somewhere else I should be checking?

Your input is much appreciated...

Thanks,

Tony @ Lunan


RE: Vendor Master Records - Copy 4 companies to New Company

$
0
0

There are many ways to do this and everyone has methods that they are more familiar with than others, such as integration manager and GP macros and direct SQL.

For me, I would write a SQL query for each company, adding a static column for the company id.

I would then UNION ALL the four company queries together.

I would then use a ROW_NUMBER() windowed function on the results of the union, groupby VENDORID and sorted by the company id to create a priority column.

I would then select out all the rows with priority =1 so we only get one instance of each vendor, and the vendor we get is of the highest priority out of your companies (as you have to decide which company will provide the data where multiple companies have that data).

I would use that data to drive a mail merge GP macro to create the vendors.

I would then use SQL to squirt all the notes and attachments from the four companies into the new vendors of the new company.

If you have these skill sets then you should be ok, otherwise I would recommend talking to your GP support partner if you are an end user about this objective and seeing what they can do for you.

RE: "An error occurred while loading or initializing an addin." - On all workstations

$
0
0

Yes, could be someone rolling out group policy that broken it then another that fixed it... or something like that!

Tim

"An error occurred while loading or initializing an addin." - On all workstations

$
0
0

So I had a client call with a system down.

The weird issue is this happened on all workstations at one time, the client has 20 local installs, two term servers and when they called I logged onto the server and got the error. All started getting the error at the same time.

Looking at the event viewer on the computers they all showed the same thing

"An error occurred while loading or initializing an addin. Ask your administrator to check the Windows event log for more details. Dynamics will now close."

Checking the Event Viewer provided a bit more information:

"Microsoft Dexterity error:

The description for Event ID 0 from source Microsoft Dexterity cannot be found. Either the component that raises this event is not installed on your local computer or the installation is corrupted. You can install or repair the component on the local computer.

Now why this is strange is usually this is just a local error that happens on one workstation? However all their workstations broke at the same time.

On the server I was checking the  Dynamics.exe.config file and making sure the DLL existed and checking the version when all of a sudden all the installs start working again.

I guess I am just wondering if anyone has any ideas what happened? We had applied the 2016 YEUP 3 weeks ago and nothing was changed since then.

RE: Calculated field total in Check Distribution Report using Report Writer

$
0
0

Hi Leslie,

I've put it in both F1 and RF.  I'd simply like a total of each check amount in H1 but like I mentioned up above, it adds the check amount for each invoice listed in H2.  Even if the check amount in H1 is $1,000, if there are 5 invoices listed in H2, it will add the $1,000 5 times.

Calculated field total in Check Distribution Report using Report Writer

$
0
0

I'd like to add a total to the report for all checks on the report.  The problem is that if a check for the amount of $1,000 is paying 10 invoices, the report total I put in will be for $10,000 instead of $1,000.  If I have multiple checks that pay multiple invoices, a report that should only be $25k can end up being $286k because it adds the same check amount for each individual invoice under that check. 

How can I make it just add the check amount once per check (instead of for each invoice) and place that at then end of the report.  So If I have 10 checks (with 5 invoices on each check) and each check is for $1,000, the report total should be $10,000 and not $50,000. 

Thanks for your help!

RE: GP 2010 EFT CTX File Format Issue

$
0
0

Hi Beat,

The bug still existed in GP 2013 RTM.  I have not tested any newer releases, so I don't know if it was ever fixed.  The CTX format I was working on at the time was for City National Bank.  The bank claimed to use a "standard" CTX format, but their spec was slightly different than the documented standard that I was able to find online.  Because the GP CTX didn't work, the customer just used CCD / CCD+ instead, without the addenda records.

Here's the format file in case you want to test with it.

EFT File Format Maintenance
City National Bank	10	1	2	0	0		0	94	0	1
3	16384.00000	1		Record Type	1			1	1	0	0	0	4	2		0	0	0
3	32768.00000	2		Priority Code	2	cmCheckbookEFT	EFT Priority Code		2	0	0	0	4	2		0	0	0
3	49152.00000	3		Transit Routing Number	2	cmCheckbookEFT	EFT Transit Routing Number		10	0	0	0	4	2		0	0	0
3	65536.00000	4		Company ID Number	2	cmCheckbookEFT	EFT Company ID		10	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
3	81920.00000	5		File Creation Date	3				6	0	0	0	18	2		0	0	2
3	98304.00000	6		File Creation Time	4				4	0	0	0	19	2		0	0	0
3	114688.00000	7		File ID Modifier	1			A	1	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
3	131072.00000	8		Record Size	1			094	3	0	0	0	4	2		0	0	0
3	147456.00000	9		Blocking Factor	2	cmCheckbookEFT	EFT Blocking Factor		2	0	0	0	4	2		0	0	0
3	163840.00000	10		Format Code	2	cmCheckbookEFT	EFT Format Code		1	0	0	0	4	2		0	0	0
3	180224.00000	11		Bank Account Number	2	cmCheckbookEFT	Bank Identification Number		23	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
3	196608.00000	12		Bank Company Name	2	cmCheckbookEFT	EFT Bank Company Name		23	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
3	212992.00000	13		Reference	2	cmCheckbookEFT	EFT Reference		8	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
4	16384.00000	1		Record Type	1			5	1	0	0	0	4	2		0	0	0
4	32768.00000	2		Service Class Code	2	cmCheckbookEFT	EFT Service Class Code		3	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0
4	49152.00000	3		Small Company Name	2	cmCheckbookEFT	EFT Small Company Name		16	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
4	65536.00000	4		Company Discretionary Data	1			DYNAMICS EFT	20	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
4	81920.00000	5		Company ID Number	2	cmCheckbookEFT	EFT Company ID		10	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
4	98304.00000	6		Standard Class Code	1			CTX	3	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
4	114688.00000	7		Company Entry Description	1			PAYABLES	10	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
4	131072.00000	8		Company Descriptive Date	5				6	0	0	0	18	1		0	0	5
4	147456.00000	9		Effective Date	5				6	0	0	0	18	2		0	0	2
4	163840.00000	10		Reserved	1				3	0	0	0	4	2		0	0	0
4	180224.00000	11		Originator Status Code	1			1	1	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
4	196608.00000	12		Transit Routing Number	2	cmCheckbookEFT	EFT Transit Routing Number		8	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
4	212992.00000	13		Batch Number	1			0000001	7	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
5	16384.00000	1		Record Type	1			6	1	0	0	0	4	2		0	0	0
5	32768.00000	2		Transaction Code	2	AddressEFT	EFT Account Type		2	0	0	0	0	2		0	0	0
5	49152.00000	3		Payee Transit Routing Number	2	AddressEFT	EFT Transit Routing Number		9	0	0	0	4	2		0	0	0
5	65536.00000	4		Payee Bank Account Number	2	AddressEFT	EFT Bank Account		17	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
5	81920.00000	5		Payment Amount	2	cmTransactionEFT	Checkbook Amount		10	0	0	0	2	2	0	2	1	0
5	98304.00000	6		Payee ID/Cross Reference Numbe	2	cmTransactionEFT	Customer/Vendor ID		15	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
5	106496.00000	7		Addenda Record Count	6				4	0	0	6	1	2	0	0	0	0
5	114688.00000	8		Payee Name	2	cmTransactionEFT	Paid ToRcvd From		16	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
5	122880.00000	9		Reserved	1				2	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
5	131072.00000	10		Discretionary Data	1			01	2	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
5	147456.00000	11		Addenda Record Indicator	6				1	0	0	1	0	2	0	0	0	0
5	163840.00000	12		Trace Number	6				15	0	0	10	1	2	0	0	0	0
6	16384.00000	1		Record Type	1			7	1	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
6	32768.00000	2		Transaction Code	1			05	2	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
6	49152.00000	3		Payment Detail	2	PM_Apply_To_HIST	Apply To Document Number		80	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
6	65536.00000	4		Addenda Count	6				4	0	0	6	1	2	0	0	0	0
6	81920.00000	5		Trace Number	6				7	0	0	5	1	2	0	0	0	0
8	16384.00000	1		Record Type	1			8	1	0	0	0	4	2		0	0	0
8	32768.00000	2		Service Class Code	2	cmCheckbookEFT	EFT Service Class Code		3	0	0	0	0	2	0	0	0	0
8	49152.00000	3		Addenda Count	6				6	0	0	13	1	2	0	0	0	0
8	65536.00000	4		Hash Total	6				10	0	0	4	1	2	0	0	0	0
8	81920.00000	5		Total Debit Amount	6				12	0	0	9	2	2	0	2	1	0
8	98304.00000	6		Total Credit Amount	6				12	0	0	8	2	2	0	2	1	0
8	114688.00000	7		Company ID Number	2	cmCheckbookEFT	EFT Company ID		10	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
8	131072.00000	8		Filler/Reserved	1				19	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
8	147456.00000	9		Filler/Reserved	1				6	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
8	163840.00000	10		Transit Routing Number	2	cmCheckbookEFT	EFT Transit Routing Number		8	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
8	180224.00000	11		Batch Number	1			0000001	7	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0
9	196608.00000	1		Record Type	1			9	1	0	0	0	4	2		0	0	0
9	212992.00000	2		Batch Count	6				6	0	0	2	1	2	0	0	0	0
9	229376.00000	3		Block Count	6				6	0	0	3	1	2	0	0	0	0
9	245760.00000	4		Addenda Count	6				8	0	0	13	1	2	0	0	0	0
9	262144.00000	5		Hash Total	6				10	0	0	4	1	2	0	0	0	0
9	278528.00000	6		Total Debit Amount	6				12	0	0	9	2	2	0	2	1	0
9	294912.00000	7		Total Credit Amount	6				12	0	0	8	2	2	0	2	1	0
9	311296.00000	8		Filler/Reserved	1				39	0	0	0	4	1		0	0	0


GP 2010 EFT CTX File Format Issue

$
0
0

Dynamics GP 2010 SP 2 (11.00.1752) added support for the EFT CTX file format, which supports multiple addenda records.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2551488

I am trying to implement the CTX format for a client, but have run into an issue with the GP 2010 EFT file format options.

The CTX format is very similar to the CCD+ format, but one difference is that the Detail record needs to include the Addenda Record Count in Field 8.

http://www.regaltek.com/docs/NACHA%20Format.pdf  (page 11)

This is very simple in concept, but GP 2010 does not appear to support the Addenda Record Count field in the Detail row.  I have added the field and set it to use the Calculation Type of "Addenda Count", but that only outputs "0000" on all Detail records.

6221231231231234567890       00000306001EFT           0000TEST EFT VENDOR   011123123120000001

I have tried a few of the other Calculation Type values, but none seem to provide the required Addenda Record Count.

I have also tried the latest March 2012 Hotfix, but the EFT options are the same and the results are the same in the EFT file.

Has anyone been able to successfully set the Addenda Record Count in a CTX format in GP 2010?  Is there a trick or workaround?  Or is this a GP bug?

UPDATE: Due to lack of response here in the Community Forums, I have posted this issue on my Dynamics GP Land blog, and will update the blog post if I receive any updates:

http://dynamicsgpland.blogspot.com/2012/05/problem-with-gp-2010-eft-payables-ccd.html

Thanks,

Steve Endow
Dynamics GP Certified Trainer
Dynamics GP Certified IT Professional


Run application error - Path name of the file.xlsx returned 5 error when choosing view on an excel deployed report within Dynamics GP 2016 R2

$
0
0

Has anyone received this error when trying to run an excel deployed report within GP "Run application error  - Path name of the file.xlsx returned 5"  When I open the report directly from excel it works fine. I am on Dynamics GP 2016 R2

RE: Vendor Master Records - Copy 4 companies to New Company

$
0
0

Nicole -

I've participated in projects which used two very different approaches for the same purpose; combining companies to take advantage of the time saving features of Binary Stream's Multi-Entity Management. First, querying numerous (60+) databases and using these queries to populate a new single entity. Second, using Corporate Renaissance Group's Company Combiner product. Both approaches require testing and validation. Querying and combining companies requires more consulting hours but does not require a software investment. CRG's Company Combiner cuts consulting hours, reduces risk but requires a software investment.

Your vendor problem is familiar territory, and proved difficult to de-duplicate. Have you considered merging all records and then using Vendor Modifier/Combiner to merge the records after the compilation?

RE: Check Printing Not Aligning Correctly

$
0
0

Lost,

GP > Tools > Setup > System > Alternate/Modified Forms and Reports controls the security/access for all Modified Reports and Windows.  There are Trial Balance Reports in three Modules (Financial, Purchasing and Sales). The only reason to go to the Alternate/Modified Forms and Reports window is if you are looking to enable or disable customizations to one of these trial balance reports. By going here to "reset some things" you may have inadvertently disabled all of your report customizations.

If you have a custom check format and you entered the Alternate/Modified Forms and Reports window (image below) and then selected "Revert to Default" you could have effectively removed all users access to the custom check format in error.  GP never overwrites the default report; in this case, check format, so it would have reverted back to the original format, discarding any changes made by users/consultants.  

To fix this, you would need to go back in, browse down to the appropriate check format hit the plus sign to the left of the format, and select the Modified version of the report. Your checks should print correctly after you make this change.

RE: GP Tax Detail Maintenance Window

$
0
0

I think this may be a duplicate post so I will give a duplicate answer:

Hi,

Sales tax can get very complicated and GP has many options in the sales tax area. Let me try to explain the Qualifiers and the 'based on' fields.

First, the Based on Field:

The Based on field helps us determine what the percentage you entered on the right applies to. Let's say we have a 5% Sales tax. 5% of what? Most of the taxes I work with apply the tax percentage to the full amount of the sale. What if only 80% of the sales price was subject to sales tax? To set this up you would select Percent of Sale/Purchase in the Based On field . The Percentage field would hold 5%. The field below the Round field tells the system what percent of the sale is subject to the 5% sales tax. In our scenario, you would enter 80% here. As soon as you enter an amount in the Taxable Percent field, the Min/Max becomes unavailable. To wrap this up, if a customer buys a $100 item their sales tax will be applied to 80% of the purchase price. So the 5% tax will be assessed on $80. The tax calculation would be $100 * 80% * 5% = $4.00

The Min/Max fields

The Min/Max fields refer to the minimum and maximum sale amount on which tax can be assessed. Let's say your state didn't charge any sales tax on sales under $20; You would enter $20 in the Min field. If your state didn't charge sales tax on sales over $5,000, you would enter $5000 in the Max field. You can use one or both of those fields.

The 'Include' field answers the question of whether you have to get the sale up to the $5,000 mark or if you only need to go from $20 to $5,000. If 'Amount within range' is selected, then you would only need to pay tax on the sale amount that is over $20 and up to $5,000. You would only pay tax on $4,980, ($5,000 - $20). If 'Full Amount' is selected, you would have to pay tax on the full $5,000. You wouldn't get any 'credit' for the part of the sale that was under $20. If I were to purchase two exotic wood tables that cost $4,000 each, tax would be assessed on the full $5000.

The Qualifiers

The Qualifiers are letting us know how we are supposed to calculate the amount of the sale when comparing it to the thresholds. Just how is that $5000 calculated? You have three choices: Unit Amount, Extended Amount or Invoice Total.

If 'Unit Amount' is selected the price of an individual item is used to see if the 'sale' went over the $5,000 mark. If I purchased two tables that cost $4000 each, I will have exceeded the minimum of $20, but not exceeded the maximum of $5,000 because neither unit cost more than $5,000. My invoiced amount would be $8000 and I would have to pay tax on all of it (or at least the total less $20).

If Extended Amount is selected, the Min/Max amount is compared to the total cost of the line item. In my two table purchase example, I would only need to pay tax on the first $5,000 (or 4,980) of the sale because the total price of the two tables exceeds $5000. Under this scenario $3,000 of the invoice would be tax free.

If Total Invoice Amount is selected, the cost of the individual items is not relevant. If I purchased items that were each under $5,000, but the total of all the purchases together was more than $5,000, I would not pay tax on the amount over $5000. This is the best deal of the three if you are the purchaser. If I purchase the two tables and some chairs, the total amount of the invoice, and not the individual items, is used to determine if the $5,000 ceiling has been met.

I hope this helps you better understand these fields.

Kind regards,

Leslie

Reconcile to GL

$
0
0

Good day all and Happy New Year!

Just a couple of questions, I am doing the Reconcile to GL, Receivables Management, and I am not too clear on a couple of things. For the month of December

Total ending RM Bal - 19,892,979.72

Total ending GL Bal - 19,809,204.28

There is a difference as you can see, the TB though is saying 19,809,204.28, is this normal?

Regards 

Rosemary

RE: Electronic 1099 / 1096 reporting to the IRS

$
0
0

I forgot I had an id here or posted this.  I usually am on the GPUG web site nowadays.  Anyhow, we have been a Green Shades customer for +/- 2 years now.

Thanks,

David

RE: Electronic 1099 / 1096 reporting to the IRS

$
0
0

Thanks for the update David. I completely missed that this post started in 2015! I should have realized that when your first post said you went live in November 2014... I guess I forgot we're already in the year 2017!


RE: Rm statements email status install Microsoft word

$
0
0

I am having a similar issue but in GP 2016 R2.  I won't send the email.  The RM Email Statement Report prints and says either Unknown Error or Insufficient Memory.  I've run dexsql logs and SQL traces and nothing points to the problem.  The template does print to the temp location but no email gets generated.  I've made sure that the RM Statement Blank Paper is the default on all companies.  I've made a different template thinking maybe the template was corrupt.  If I print the statements, template is the default and it prints to the screen beautifully.  All other email documents work fine and push to my outlook as they should without errors.  I know this thread is mainly about GP 2013 R2, but I did notice that Microsoft said there were bugs with their dlls not working correctly and it was fixed in GP 2015.  Anyone having this issue with GP 2016 R2 and have any suggestions?

Rm statements email status install Microsoft word

$
0
0

when my customer runs the email version of the rm statements they receive a message "* install Microsoft Word". They are using word templates and some customers are successful but others bring up this odd error. Running GP 2013 R2. My next step is to check the difference between the customers. All should have an email address and be using PDF file extension.

Mickey

RE: State Wages don't Match Federal Wages on W-2 in GP2013(R2)

$
0
0

Thank you Leslie, Yes I have the pay checked subject to state taxes, I have the employee record also checked subject to state taxes, but it still didn't add to the employee's state wages. I did have to go in and edit all the W-2's that needed correcting, not fun, but fixable. For next year I am not going to use the Pay Code I set up as a business expense, I am hoping that will be the fix. I am also going to compare the tables you suggested below.  Thank you for the information.

State Wages don't Match Federal Wages on W-2 in GP2013(R2)

$
0
0

States Wages do not match Federal wages for Tip reimbursement. Tip Reimbursement is check report as wages, it is also included in wages under earnings setup. Why isn't it included in State wages? How do I fix this on the W-2s?

RE: Label Printing from GP

$
0
0

Where have you found the option of printing labels in GP?  For GP do you use local printers or network printers?

Viewing all 45450 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>